Bigan Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30049 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-566 Year-2024 Thana- PANCHRUKHI District- Siwan ====================================================== Bigan Chaudhary S/o- Late Baburam Chaudhary Village- Sarauti, P. S. - Panchrukhi, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard Mr. Raghav Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Yogendra Kumar, learned APP.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Panchrukhi P.S. Case No. 566 of 2024 for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 302(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. lodged on 01.12.2024 by the informant, Munna Yadav.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that he was plugging the field when the agnates including the petitioner reached, allegation against this petitioner is of giving 'dab' blow on the head of the informant causing injury. Later, they escaped. This led to the FIR.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30049 of 2025(5) dt.06-08-2025 2/2 there is admitted land dispute, both are agnates and exaggerated FIR is there.

5. Learned counsel for the informant, Mr. Tiwari on the other hand has taken this Court to the injury report which is part of the case diary to show that the injury has been found to be grievous in nature.

6. Considering the submission of the parties as also the nature of injury, for the present, this Court is not inclined to extend him the privilege of bail.

7. The bail application stands rejected.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U T