Masudan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30158 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1137 Year-2025 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Masudan Paswan S/O Late Basant Paswan R/O Vill.- Bhadeja, P.S.- Mufassil, Dist.- Gaya.

2.

Suraj Paswan S/O Raju Paswan R/O Vill.- Bhadeja, P.S.- Mufassil, Dist.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 1137 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 329(3), 109, 117(2), 174, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner Suraj Paswan assaulted the informant with an iron rod on his temple, due to which he received bleeding injury and his leg was fractured. The allegation against petitioner Masudan Paswan is that he has misbehaved with the minor daughter of the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30158 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the injury which has been received by the informant namely, Jamun Chaudhary is simple in nature. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they are languishing in judicial custody since 04.01.2026.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya Ji in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 1137 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T