Dilip Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 29957 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2019 Thana- DANDARI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Dilip Yadav aged about 38 years S/o Late Gulo Yadav Resident of VillagePratarpur, P.S.- Dandari, District- Begusarai ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Shantanu Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mr. Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-11-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State through Video Conferencing.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25/26/31 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
One country made pistol and two live cartridges have been allegedly recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was remanded in this case on 8.9.2019 and Charge sheet has also been filed in the case and there is no chance of conclusion of the trial in near future. Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 29957 of 2020(2) dt.23-11-2020 2/2 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in Dandari Police Station Case No. 96 of 2019 on the following conditions:-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T