Kanhaiya Manjhi v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52861 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1063 Year- 2014 Thana -SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSARAN ======================================================
1. Kanhaiya Manjhi Son of Nanhak Manjhi, resident of Village- Mishraulia, P.S. Jalalpur, District Saran at Chapra.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Bigan Devi Wife of Kanhaiya Manjhi resident of Village- Mishraulia, P.S. Jalalpur, District Saran at Chapra. Present D/o Madan Manjhi resident of Tirmarwa Tola, P.S. Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shakil Ahmad Khan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A and 494 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52861 of 2018 (2) dt.04-09-2018 petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Complaint Case No. 1063 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V./- U T