Anshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34651 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-319 Year-2024 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Anshu Kumar Son of Raj Kumar Yadav Resident of Village - Arhit Daulatpur, Police Station - Ghoshi (Okari), District - Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shyamal Prakash, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 319 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 411 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused were found to be firing and their involvement was found in the theft of sand.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It has been further submitted that the name of the petitioner has been disclosed by co-villagers as one of the persons who had fled away from the place of occurrence. It has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34651 of 2026(2) dt.19-05-2026 2/2 further been submitted that no marks of violence was found at the place of occurrence, moreover, the petitioner has been named by local inimical villagers. It has further been submitted that petitioner is not the owner of the tractor which was seized from the place of occurrence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, in connection with Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 319 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.)

7. This application stands allowed.

(Praveen Kumar, J) niku/rupa/- U T