← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53261/2018bail granted

Chintamuni Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-20Mr. Justice Vikash Jain3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53261 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -253 Year- 2018 Thana -BARARI District- KATIHAR ======================================================

1. Chintamuni Devi, W/o Ramlal Lohra,

2. Sabita Devi @ Savita Devi W/o Chunnu Lohra,

3. Anita Devi W/o Sonu Lohra,

4. Chandmuni Devi W/o Heeralal Lohra,

5. Mosmat Guddi Devi, W/o Late Ashok Lohra, All are R/o Maharani, P.S.- Barari, Distt.- Katihar.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 20-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 354, 504, 325/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Barari P.S. Case No. 253 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and the thrust of accusations is against accused Ramlal Lohra and Heera Lal Lohra who are said to have made assault and snatching cash. The allegations against the present

petitioners are general and omnibus in nature. Petitioners are ladies having clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Barari P.S. Case No. 253 of 2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners.

(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) The petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of

failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U T