Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40323/2021dismissed

Vivek Kumar @ Bullu Rai @ Billu Rai @ Ballu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2021-08-25Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40323 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-501 Year-2019 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Vivek Kumar @ Bullu Rai @ Billu Rai @ Ballu Rai (M), aged about 27 years, S/O Sri Mahendra Ray R/O Village-Bhagwanpur, P.S- Sadar, DistrictMuzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikram Deo Singh, Adv.

For the State :

Ms. Bela Singh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 25-08-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State through video conference. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking that all the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter shall be removed, and compliance with the conditions of the notices of this Court with regard to acceptance of e-filing shall be made, without delay immediately upon resumption of normal physical functioning of the Court, and in any event within one month thereof.

2. The petitioner who is in custody since 27.11.2019 has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with S. Tr. No. 07 of 2021 arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No. 501 of 2019 registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, later on Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code was added and Section

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40323 of 2021(2) dt.25-08-2021 2/2 27 of the Arms Act, having earlier been dismissed by order dated 19.10.2020 in Cr. Misc. No. 20081 of 2020.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case due to dirty village politics. It is further submitted that the petitioner has already suffered more than one year and seven months in custody since 27.11.2019.

4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.

5. Having regard to the nature of accusations and gravity of offence alleged, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this bail application stands dismissed with the observation that the trial be concluded expeditiously.

6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) rishi/- U T