← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31229/2022bail granted

Kanhai Lal Yadav @ Kanhaiya Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-22Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31229 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2021 Thana- PRANPUR District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.

KANHAI LAL YADAV @ KANHAIYA YADAV S/o- Lagan Yadav @ Ram Lagan Yadav R/o- Bari Laxmipur, P .S. - Mansahi, Distt.- Katihar. 2.

Khushi Lal yadav @ Khushee Lal Yadav S/o- lagan Yadav @ Ram Lagan yadav R/o- Bari Laxmipur, P .S. - Mansahi, Distt.- Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 354, 452, 435, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that in the night of 22.05.2021, all the accused persons named in the FIR, including the petitioners, came carrying deadly weapons and assaulted her as well as her family members, it is further alleged that Hiralal Yadav tore her clothes and also took away ornaments from her possession, thereafter Kanhaiya Yadav and Shobha Yadav assaulted her devar and fled

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31229 of 2022(2) dt.22-11-2022 2/2 by firing in the air.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that even the injuries suffered are simple in nature, further the allegation does not inspire any confidence as no motive has been assigned for the occurrence and there is a counter case also.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Pranpur P.S. Case No. 75 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T