Md. Ehsan Alam @ Md. Ehsan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31433 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2025 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Md. Ehsan Alam @ Md. Ehsan S/o Md. Sagir Alam @ Sagir Alam Resident of Gram Manan Bigha, PS.- Barachatti, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ladli Parween W/o Allauddin R/o Manan Bigha, P.s.- Barachatti, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shafiuddin Ahmad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-05-2025 Heard Mr. Shafiuddin Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 126(2), 115, 76, 351(2) of BNS and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has teased the minor daughter of the informant with ill will.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the occurrence is of 28.01.2025 whereas the FIR was lodged on 01.02.2025 without explaining the delay. From perusal of the impugned order, it transpires that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31433 of 2025(2) dt.15-05-2025 2/2 the learned trial court has recorded that the victim has given her statement under Section 183 of BNSS wherein she has stated that Ehsan (petitioner) has not committed any evil act with her rather the mother of the petitioner had abused the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that parties have compromised the case. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 01.02.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Barachatti P.S. Case No. 54 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge POCSO cum ADJ-VII Gaya.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T