Babban Singh v. Hundilal Choudhary The Chairman Cum Managing Director National Project Construction Corporation Ltd.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3460 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2753 of 2011 ====================================================== Babban Singh, Son of late Ramadhar Singh, Resident of Village -Mohania, Near Railway Station, At & PS - Mohania District Kaimur Presently residing at Village- Salempur ward no. 12, Post Salempur Ps Mail District Deoria (U.P) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. Hundilal Choudhary The Chairman Cum Managing Director National Project Construction Corporation Ltd. Plot no. 67 Sector 25, Faridabad Haryana.
2. Hundi Lal Choudhary, the Chairman Managing Director-cumDisciplinary Authority+ National Project Construction Ltd. Plot no. 67-68 Sector 25 Faridabad -121004
3. Rakesh Mohan Kotwal, The General Manager, National Project Construction Corporation Ltd. North Easter Sector Office, Kunjban Colony, West tripura District Agartala -799005
4. Akhilesh Mishra , the Chief Manager (HR) National Project Construction Corporation Ltd. C.O. Faridabad.
5. Rakesh Mohan Kotwal, The Zonal Manager, National Project , Construction Corporation Ltd. Neliason, Office 31 Harish Thakur Road, Agartla 799001
6. U.N Thakur, The Zonal Manager , National Construction Corporation Ltd. Bihar Zone, Sri Krishna Nagar Patna.
7. S.P. Rao, The Unit Officer, National Construction Corporation Ltd. Hathiari P/H, Unit Vikas Nagar District Dehradu Uttaranchal.
8. Ayaz Khan, The Project Manager, National Project Construction Corporation Ltd.PMGSY Rohtas Worsk 650 Panchsheel colony, Sasaram District Rohtas 821115 .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, Sr.Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Arun ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 21-08-2018 Learned senior counsel representing the petitioner submits that in terms of the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite parties payments have been made to the petitioner.
Patna High Court MJC No.3460 of 2015 (5) dt.21-08-2018 However, the petitioner has taken away the brief from his office and seems to be not interested in pursuing the matter. Learned counsel representing the State-opposite parties is present.
In the aforesaid circumstance, the application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- U