Umesh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9828 of 2019 ====================================================== Umesh Sharma Son of Late Taleshwar Sharma, Resident of Village and Post Office- Siyarampur, Police Station- Paliganj, District- Patna. At present resident at C/o Lal Mani Niwas, Sir Ganesh Dutt Path, Kaliket Nagar, Danapur, Patna- 801503. .
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Patna. 3.
The Additional Collector-cum-First Appellate Authority, Patna. 4.
The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Paliganj, Patna. 5.
The Circle Officer, Paliganj Circle, Patna.
6.
Sri Tripurari Sharan Srivastava, the then Circle Officer, Paliganj Circle, Patna.
7.
Sri Madhesh Ram, Halka Karamchari, Paliganj Circle, Patna. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Gopal Govind Mishra For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Raj Kishore Roy (Gp18) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-05-2019 The petitioner has a grievance against respondents No. 6 and 7, who were Circle Officer, Paliganj Circle, and Halka Karamchari, Paliganj Circle respectively, at the relevant point of time in the matter of a mutation proceeding. It is the petitioner's grievance that they had harassed the petitioner a lot in course of disposal of his mutation application and subsequent compliance of the order passed by the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, for mutation of the land.
Whether respondents No. 6 and 7 have committed any
Patna High Court CWJC No.9828 of 2019(2) dt.16-05-2019 2/2 such act, which constitutes misconduct, can be gone into only by the disciplinary authority. The petitioner does not have any legal right to get any disciplinary action initiated against them. Further, no direction for payment of compensation for harassment caused by the said respondents can be issued in a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner shall be at liberty to pursue his remedy before the appropriate forum in accordance with law.
This writ application stands disposed of.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U