Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31123 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2025 Thana- GAUTAMBUDHNAGAR District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.
Nitish Kumar S/o Chandra Keshwar Rai R/o Village - Raypur Bindgawa, P.S. - Doriganj, Dist. - Saran at Chapra.
2.
Mukesh Kumar Rai @ Mukesh Kumar S/o Parma Rai R/o Village - Raypur Bindgawa, P.S. - Doriganj, Dist. - Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 1.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 2384 litres of liquor from a DCM vehicle. 4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and are not the owners of the seized vehicle and they came to be implicated
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31123 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026 2/3 based on confessional statement of Ranjan in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value. It is next submitted that after amendment in the Excise Act in the year 2018, the concept of deemed possession and presumed offender has been done away with.
5.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with G.B Nagar P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7.
It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in the event if it is found that petitioners have antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioners, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed their antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31123 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026 3/3 be confirmed with respect to that petitioner who had concealed his criminal antecedent before this Court, but after verification if it is found that petitioners are person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T