Savitri Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46185 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2016 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya ======================================================
1. Savitri Devi, W/o Jageshwar Chaudhary,
2. Laxmi Devi @ Laxminiya Devi W/o Gariban Chaudhary,
3. Ajay Chaudhary S/o Jageshwar Chaudhary,
4. Sntosh Chaudhary @ Sadhu Chaudhary S/o Gariban Chaudhary, All R/o Vill.- Mastpura, P.S.- Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Smt. Sahin Begam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 18-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Bodhgaya P.S. case no. 216 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 387 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that instant case has been filed because of land dispute. Petitioners have clean antecedent.
In the written report, there is allegation that these petitioners demanded rangadari of Rs five lacs from the informant to allow him construction work. There is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46185 of 2018(2) dt.18-08-2018 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Bodhgaya P.S. case no. 216 of 2016 , they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the CJM Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.
with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T