Noorjaha Khatoon @ Nursaba Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33999 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-291 Year-2022 Thana- UCHKAGAON District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.
NOORJAHA KHATOON @ NURSABA KHATOON D/O MD. AKHTAR R/O Village - Arna, P.S- Uchkagaon, Distt.- Gopalganj. 2.
Munni Khatoon W/O Md. Akhtar @ Akhtar Shah R/O Village- Arna, P.SUchkagaon, Distt.- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vyas Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-07-2023
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 307, 332, 333, 353, 337, 338, 224, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are women.
4. The informant alleges that while he along with police force were returning with apprehended accused Md. Akhtar the accused persons including the petitioners started pelting stones to free Md. Akhtar on account of which injury was caused to the police force but they somehow managed to save the accused to the police station and thereafter got themselves treated in the hospital.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33999 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 2/2
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that from bare perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that there is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioners rather the allegation of pelting stones and assaulting is general and omnibus in nature.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Uchkagaon P.S. Case No. 291 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T