← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41441/2021allowed

Shailendra Rajbhar @ Shailendra Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-21Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41441 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2021 Thana- NAUTAN District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Shailendra Rajbhar @ Shailendra Kumar Ray Son of Ram Balak Rajbhar @ Ram Balak Prasad Resident of Village - Domadih, P.S. Mairwa, District - Siwan.

2.

Satyendra Rajbhar @ Satyendra Prasad Son of Ram Balak Rajbhar @ Ram Balak Prasad Resident of Village - Domadih, P.S. Mairwa, District - Siwan. 3.

Hari Om Rajbhar @ Golu Son of Shailendra Rajbhar @ Shailendra Kumar Ray Resident of Village - Domadih, P.S. Mairwa, District - Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Chandra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners in the present case are seeking prearrest bail in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No.22 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the First Information Report, the allegation against the petitioners is of kidnapping of the minor daughter of the informant aged about 16 years.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the victim girl in her

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41441 of 2021(2) dt.21-03-2022 2/2 statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has stated that she has love affair with co-accused Abhimanu and she has solemnized marriage with him at temple in Chapra on 25.02.2021. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph '3' of the application. Learned APP for the State is present and has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, let the petitioners above-named in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No.22 of 2021 be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T