Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.58 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar Son of Shri Bhupesh Gupta @ Bhup Narayan Sao, permanent resident of Village Gorkha, P.S. Alinagar, District- Darbhanga presently residing at 'Shourya Hotel' adjacent to Patliputra Golambar, P.O. and P.S. Patliputra, Patna- 800013.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Old Secretariate, Patna- 800015. 3.

The Inspector General of Police, Patna Zone, Police office, Patna- 800001. 4.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Polcie Office, Patna- 800001.

5.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna- 800001. 6.

The City Superintendant of Police, Central Patna- 800001. 7.

The Deputy Superintendant of Police, Law and Order, Kotwali Police Station Campus, Patna- 800001.

8.

The Station House Officer, Patliputra Police Station, Patna- 800013. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. S.S.Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, AC to GP-5.

For the Respondent no.5 :

Mr. Girish Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-01-2020 Heard the counsel for the parties.

2. This application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred for issuance of command upon the respondents to stop harassment of the petitioner at the hands of the local police. Further prayer is for a direction for registration of a police case against the police men involved in harassment of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.58 of 2017(5) dt.10-01-2020 2/2

3. Preliminary objection has been raised on behalf of learned counsel for respondent no.9, Patliputra Cooperative Housing Construction Society Limited that the petitioner and others had encroached upon the land of the society which was resisted by the society. Petitioner has already filed a civil suit for redressal of his grievance.

4. In view of the nature of dispute between the parties, the writ Court cannot interfere in the matter, hence, this application is dismissed being devoid of merit. (Birendra Kumar, J) B.Kr./- U