Satrudhan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32354 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2024 Thana- DORIGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== Satrudhan Rai S/o Tulsi Rai R/o Village- Chakiya, P.S.- Doriganj, DistrictSaran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 13-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No. 145 of 2024 lodged on 04.07.2024, for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 352, 351(3), 109, 303(2) & 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against eight named accused persons including the present petitioner against whom there is an allegation that they have assaulted the informant and his family members by means of lathi, khanti, farsa. Allegation of snatching golden chain and locket from the informant's side is also there in the FIR.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32354 of 2025(3) dt.13-08-2025 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that save and except that petitioner is member of the mob, no other act or overt act is against the petitioner. Counsel submits that there is a previous enmity going on between the parties and in the said enmity, the informant's side have killed the brother of the petitioner for which, Koilwar P.S. Case No.210 of 2024 was registered under Sections 302/34 of the I.P.C. and section 27 of the Arms Act. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the informant vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is there is a specific allegation against the petitioner and other accused persons that they all in connivance with each other, have assaulted the informant's side due to which injury has been caused.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner but submits that there is a general and omnibus allegation against the present petitioner.

7. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of this case, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32354 of 2025(3) dt.13-08-2025 3/3 Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Doriganj P.S. Case No. 145 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U T