Dr. Hari Shankar Prasad Shrivastwa v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 10444 of 2019 ====================================================== Dr Hari Shankar Prasad Shrivastwa S/oLate Bhrigunath Prasad Resident of Village-Madhopur Tansariya,P.S. Turkaulia,Dist.-East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health and family Welfare, Govt of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Secretary, Department of Health and family Welfare, Govt of Bihar, Patna 3.
The Deputy Secretary, Department of Health and family Welfare, Govt of Bihar, Patna 4.
The Additional Director cum the Enquiry Officer, Health Services, Bihar, Patna 5.
The Branch Officer cum Presenting Officer, Branch-9, Department of Health, Bihar, Patna 6.
The District Magistrate, Gopalganj 7.
The Deputy Secretary-cum-Chief Vigilance Officer, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Govt of Bihar, Patna 8.
The Deputy Director-cum-Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Department of Health Govt of Bihar, Patna 9.
The Under Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Govt of Bihar, Patna 10.
The Director-In-Chief, Health Service, Govt of Bihar, Patna 11.
The Regional Deputy Director, Health Service, Chapra 12.
The Civil Surgeon, Gopalganj, Dist.-Gopalganj 13.
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Hathuwa, Dist.-Gopalganj 14.
The In-charge Medical Officer, Referral Hospital, Katiya, Gopalganj 15.
The Treasury Officer, Gopalganj 16.
The Treasury Officer, Secretariat Treasury ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr Shashank Chandra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr Ravi Kumar, AC to GP XIII ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 20-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the
Patna High Court CWJC No.10444 of 2019(2) dt.20-09-2022 2/2 respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief, as prayed in the instant writ petition, has become infructuous, due to events subsequent to filing of the writ petition. The subsequent development is an order passed under Rule 43 (b) of the Bihar Pension Rules, which the petitioner has assailed by filing CWJC No 14619 of 2021 before this Court. In view of the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U