← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/995/2022disposed

Smt. Archana Devi v. Braj Kishore, The Authorized Officer, Secured Assets Recovery Branch (Sarb), State Bank Of India

2024-02-17Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.995 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1690 of 2022 ====================================================== Smt. Archana Devi, Wife of Shri Birendra Kumar Resident of Shokhara-2, Kalambagh Tola, Barauni, District- Begusarai, Pin- 851112. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Braj Kishore, The Authorized Officer, Secured Assets Recovery Branch (SARB), State Bank of India 2nd Floor, Patna Main Branch Building, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna 800001, presently posted as Assistant General Manager.

2.

Kundan Kumar Sinha, Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Industrial Area Branch, Deona, Begusarai.

3.

Pravin Kumar, Registrar, Debts Recovery Tribunal, 2nd Floor, Karpuri Thakur Sadan, Kendriya Karamchari Parisar (GPOA), Ashiana-Digha Road, Patna- 800025.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) Date : 17-02-2024 Present M.J.C-Contempt Petition is filed for noncompliance of order dated 21.03.2022 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1690 of 2022.

2. During pendency of the present petition, Respondent-State Bank of India complied the orders of this Court belatedly. The Respondent Bank were required to comply the orders of the Court within three months from the date of

Patna High Court MJC No.995 of 2022 dt.17-02-2024 2/2 petitioner's representation pursuant to the orders of this Court dated 21.03.2022. On the other hand, they have taken almost more than one year. Thus, they have committed Contempt of Court.

3. Be that as it may orders of this Court has been complied belatedly, hence petitioner is entitled to litigation cost and it is quantified Rs. 5000/- (Rs. Five thousand). Cost shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today. If any remaining grievance of the petitioner is required to be redressed by the respondent Bank, in that event, petitioner is at liberty to approach them in filing representation.

4. Accordingly, the present M.J.C-Contempt petition stands disposed of.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Alok Kumar Pandey, J) manish/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 19.02.2024 Transmission Date N.A