← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8813/2022dismissed

Krishna Kant Ram @ Krishan Kant Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-01Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8813 of 2022 ====================================================== Krishna Kant Ram @ Krishan Kant Ram Son of Late Lutawan Mochi @ Lutawan Ram Resident of Village Baghakol, Post Patut, P.S. Bikram, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Primary Education Department, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Patna. 5.

The District Magistrate-cum-the Collector, Patna. 6.

The District Education Officer, Patna.

7.

The District Programme Officer, Establishment, Patna. 8.

The Chairman of NIOS, Government of India, New Delhi. 9.

The Regional Director of NIOS, Lalit Bhawan, Patna. 10.

The Block Education Officer, Bikram, Patna.

11.

The Block Development Officer, Bikram, Patna. 12.

The Executive Officer, the Block Teacher Employment Unit, Bikram, Patna. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madhukar Mishra, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Smt. Shilpa Singh ( Ga 12 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2022

1. The case is being taken up from defect side.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to submit the original petition along with attested affidavits and also remove the defects pointed out by the Registry within two weeks from today.

3. The petitioner is a Panchayat Teacher.

4. Keeping in view the provisions available for filing of appeal for redressal of grievances, the writ petition is dismissed.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8813 of 2022(2) dt.01-07-2022 2/2

5. In terms of judgment dated 23.02.2012, passed in C.W.J.C. No.5489 of 2020 (Suresh Ram Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the petitioner is at liberty to file appeal. (Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) amit/- Item no.38 U