← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30564/2020dismissed

Nanddeo Sharma @ Nandeo Sharma @ Nanndeo Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-03Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30564 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2015 Thana- GWALPARA District- Madhepura ====================================================== NANDDEO SHARMA @ NANDEO SHARMA @ NANNDEO SHARMA Son of Late Jagadish Sharma Resident of Village - Shishwapatti, Ward No. 08, Police Station - Gwalpara (O.P. Arar), District - Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surya Narayan Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence initially, registered under Sections 323, 341, 342, 354, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on, Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was also added.

Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure-1 to the present application taking into account that the petitioner pressed the testicles of the deceased. A report was called for from the trial court. It has been reported that out of 11 prosecution witnesses, eight prosecution witnesses have already been examined. It is further reported that the trial is expected to be concluded within a period of two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30564 of 2020(3) dt.03-02-2021 2/2 months.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the nature of allegation and the stage of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Gwalpara (O.P. Arar) P.S. Case No. 58 of 2015 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 87 of 2017 is rejected. Learned trial court is directed to take all necessary steps to cconclude the trial of the petitioner preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T