Budhdeo Thakur @ Budhdeo Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30279 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2018 Thana- DHAMDAHA District- Purnia ====================================================== BUDHDEO THAKUR @ BUDHDEO KUMAR THAKUR Son of Fekan Thakur Resident of Village - Beldari Patraha, Maldiha, P.S.- Barhara Kothi, District - Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhola Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is recovery of one looted mobile and Rs.15,000/- from possession of the petitioner, however, petitioner claims said money to be his own money. Earlier also, petitioner had moved this Court for grant of regular bail which was rejected vide Annexue 1 with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year in jail custody.

It has been submitted that petitioner is in custody since 08.07.2018, i.e., more than two years.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30279 of 2020(2) dt.03-02-2021 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with S. T. No.437/2018 arising out of Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 143/2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T