← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7559/2016dismiss for nonprosecution

Kailash Das v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-11-18Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7559 of 2016 ====================================================== Kailash Das son of Late Gultan Das, resident of Village- Ghorghat, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Land Acquisition, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Commissioner cum Secretary, Public Works Department, N H Division, Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Land Acquisition Officer, Bhagalpur.

6.

The Superintending Engineer, P.W.D., National Highway Division, Bhagalpur.

7.

The Executive Engineer, National Highway Division, P.W.D., Bhagalpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sarvesh Kr. Singh, AAG-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 18-11-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though the State is present.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for a direction to the respondent authorities to pay the compensation for the house which requires to demolish for the construction of the approach road and authority only grants part of house which

Patna High Court CWJC No.7559 of 2016(4) dt.18-11-2025 2/3 will be demolished though the house after demolition will not safe for use as behind the house Mani river situated which is in rainy season flooded with water;

(ii) for restraining the respondents authorities not the demolish the house of the petitioners as except this house the petitioner has no other space to reside;

(iii) to pay the adequate compensation at the rate of similar situated lands of other adjacent Mauja against the land to be taken by the respondents for construction of approaching road;

(iv) for a direction upon the respondents to pay the commercial rate of the land which is being acquired and not to pay the agricultural rate to the petitioner above lands and house situated just beside of N.H.80 and they have shop for livelihood and further rate may be fixed as per other direction held by the Hon'ble Apex Court of India time to time.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7559 of 2016(4) dt.18-11-2025 3/3 (v) for a direction upon the respondents particularly the respondents No. 5 to 7 to get the matter settled amicable in terms of the law established and keeping in view of the welfare scheme sponsored by the State time to time for the benefit of the land loosers;

(vi) further for any other appropriate relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled in the facts and circumstances of this case.

3. For want of prosecution, the writ petition is dismissed.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U