Renu Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30216 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2019 Thana- DINARA District- Rohtas ====================================================== RENU DEVI, Wife of Magru Thakur, Resident of Village- Nauwan, P.S.- Dinara, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Babu Nandan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-01-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case in brief is that the informant gave his written report, it is stated that his daughter aged about 13 years, she went to her school for studying in Class-IX on 18.04.2020. Thereafter, the elder sister of the victim was reached in the school to receive her younger sister, in the meantime, she saw that one of the boy namely Rajesh Kumar riding in his motorcycle to the victim and fled away from the said school, at that time, I was in Gujarat. Thereafter, his wife alongwith his daughter have informed to the informant (father

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30216 of 2020(3) dt.06-01-2021 2/3 of the victim) to this occurrence. When I returned his house from Gujarat then I went to the house of Rajesh Kumar and asked from his mother about the occurrence but all family members of the Rajesh Kumar abuses to me. All accused persons including the (petitioner) wife of Mangru Thakur are involved in this case.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is in jail custody since 29.11.2019. The petitioner belongs to lower caste The petitioner has no criminal antecedent which is mentioned in para 3 of the bail petition. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Perused the records including the statement of the victim recorded u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C. has supported the prosecution case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected at present in connection with POCSO Case No. 124/2019 arising out of Dinara P.S. Case No. 119/2019 from the Court of learned 1st Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30216 of 2020(3) dt.06-01-2021 3/3 Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T