← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (DB)/462/2022dismiss for nonprosecution

Anil Kumar Dev v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-18Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Sourendra Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.462 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2017 Thana- BAKHARI DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== ANIL KUMAR DEV Son of Late Brahmdev Poddar Resident of Village - Parihara, P.S. - Bakhari, District - Begusrai. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Keshav Mishra Son of Late Shambhu Mishra Resident of Village - Parihara, P.S. - Bakhari, District - Begusrai. 3.

Indal Yadav Son of Ramu Yadav @ Ramanand yadav Resident of Village - Parihara, P.S. - Bakhari, District - Begusarai. 4.

Suman Kumar Singh @ Sonu Singh Son of Amin Singh Resident of Village - Parihara, P.S. - Bakhari, District - Begusrai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

None.

For the Respondent-State :

Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 18-11-2025 None appears for the appellant.

2. On 14.07.2022, learned counsel for the appellant was granted four weeks' time to remove the defects. On 04.04.2023, when the matter was listed, no one appeared on behalf of the appellant. Still, the Court granted two weeks' time to the appellant to remove the defects.

Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.462 of 2022(4) dt.18-11-2025 2/2

3. Today also, no one is appearing on behalf of the appellant.

4. This Court cannot go on granting adjournments to the appellant. It seems that the appellant has lost his interest in the case. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) ( Sourendra Pandey, J) brajesh/- U