← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31968/2022bail granted

Saddam @ Md. Saddam v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-22Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31968 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2022 Thana- ALAMNAGAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

SADDAM @ MD. SADDAM Son of Md. Dhalo @ Md. Kamaddin Resident of Village - Madholi, Ward No.-15m P.S. - Alamnagar, District - Madhepura.

2.

Vikash @ Md. Umar Faruk Son of Md. Dhalo @ Md. Kamuddin Resident of Village - Madholi, Ward No.-15m P.S. - Alamnagar, District - Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 379, 354(B), 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have antecedent of one case which was instituted by the president informant earlier and the informant alleges that the accused persons, including the petitioners, assaulted him causing injury on nose and his wife was disrobed by the petitioner and the accused persons and Dhalo snatched her silver chain.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31968 of 2022(2) dt.22-11-2022 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from perusal of Annexure-2 it would manifest that the injury suffered is simple and no injury was found on the nose.

Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners but are not able to meet the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the injury suffered is simple and there is no injury on nose.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Alamnagar P.S. Case No. 62 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T