Ranjan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42692 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== RANJAN YADAV S/O SRI RAM JI YADAV R/O VILLAGE-GAURA, P.SMOHANIYA, DISTRICT-KAIMUR (BHABHUA) BIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

SANGEETA DEVI W/O RANJAN YADAV R/O VILLAGE-GAURA, P.SMOHANIYA, DISTRICT-KAIMUR (BHABHUA) BIHAR AT PRESENT R/O VILLAGE-CHAUKHDA, P.S-KUDRA, DISTRICT-KAIMUR (BHABHUA) BIHAR.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-03-2022 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Let the defect(s) be removed within two weeks of the complete start of the physical Court in normal course. The petitioner, who is in custody since 31.03.2021, seeks regular bail in connection with Mahila Bhabua P.S. Case No. 52 of 2019, for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 504 and 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The complaint is the wife of petitioner, earlier, the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail vide A.B.P. No. 740 of 2019 from the Court of Addl. Sessions Judge-II, Kaimur,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42692 of 2021(3) dt.09-03-2022 2/3 Bhabhua, however, due to the compliant made by his wife, the bail bond of the petitioner was cancelled.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be given another chance to keep his wife with full dignity and honour. The petitioner will provide her financial demand of his wife as and when she makes so. Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case and looking into the period of custody and also the fact petitioner and O.P. No.2 want to lead their conjugal life, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on provisional bail, for a period of one year, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Kaimur, Bhabua in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No. 52 of 2019 and on such terms and conditions which he finds fit and proper.

After completion of one year, both the parties will appear before the learned Court below. The learned Court below after verifying the conduct of both the parties shall take a decision either to confirm the provisional bail or to cancel the same in the facts of the case and on such conditions as he may fit proper.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42692 of 2021(3) dt.09-03-2022 3/3 application is disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) manish/- U T