← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41150/2021bail granted

Ranjit Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-20Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41150 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2021 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

RANJIT SAH Son of Indradeo Sah Resident of Village - Maharua, P.S. Bheldi, Dist. - Saran.

2.

Vinod sah Son of Janardan Sah Resident of Village - Maharua, P.S. Bheldi, Dist. - Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2022 Heard Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, learned counsel for the petitioner No.2 and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner No.2 seeks regular bail in connection with Bheldi PS Case No. 145/2021 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 147, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506/34 of the IPC.

The allegation in a nutshell is that the petitioner assaulted the father of informant by means of sword. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a case and counter case inasmuch as Bheldi PS Case No. 146/2021 has been lodged under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC against the informant and others and both the parties are co-villagers having land dispute. He further submits that from perusal of the injury report, it would be evident that minor injury has been caused to the informant's

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41150 of 2021(3) dt.20-04-2022 2/2 father in his finger and the doctor in para-33 of the case diary has opined the nature of injury as generalized brain atrophy. He next submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.05.2021 and the co-accused/petitioner no.1, namely, Ranjit Sah has been granted bail by this Court vide instant bail application by order dated 29.01.2022.

Regards being had to the submissions made by the parties and taking into consideration the material that there is a case and counter case between the parties, both the parties are co-villagers having land dispute, petitioner is in custody since 11.05.2021, the co-accused, Ranjit Sah has been granted bail by this Court and no serious injury has been found on the person of the victim, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, let the petitioner no.2, VINOD SAH be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saran at Chapra/ the court concerned in connection with Behldi PS Case No. 145/2021.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) perwez U T