← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31950/2022bail granted

Ranjeeta Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-29Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31950 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2022 Thana- NAUTAN District- Siwan ====================================================== Ranjeeta Devi, Wife Of Dinesh Sah Resident Of Village - Narkatiya, Ps. - Nautan, Dist.- Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Kumari Anupam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and the informant alleges that her daughter was married to Ravindra Sah and out of the wedlock, a child was born, who presently is 10 years old. It is next alleged that Ravindra Sah had illicit relation with his sister-inlaw that is the petitioner and thus, it is alleged that Ravindra Sah used to assault the daughter of the informant causing injury. It is also alleged that the daughter was assaulted by an iron rod by Ravindra Sah causing injury to ear and mouth.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31950 of 2022(2) dt.29-09-2022 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that the allegation of assault is against Ravindra Sah and the informant without any bases has falsely alleged that Ravindra Sah was having illicit relation with the petitioner. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Nautan P. S. Case No.27 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T