Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31657/2019bail granted

Pradeep Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-08Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31657 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-254 Year-2013 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== PRADEEP THAKUR Son of Late Rajendra Thakur Resident of VillageHabibhouar, Police Station-Bahera, District-Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 08-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 383, 353, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 254/2013.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the accusations are general and omnibus in nature. Similarly situated co-accused Dev Kumar Thakur has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 28717 of 2017. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Benipur, District Darbhanga, in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 254/2013, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner. ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31657 of 2019(3) dt.08-08-2019 2/2 conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T