Ajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31650 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-672 Year-2025 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Ajeet Kumar S/o Rajeshwar Rai R/o Village - Chakiya(Doriganj), Police Station - Doriganj, District - Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No.672 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 111, 109, 132 & 3(5) of the BNS and under Sections 25(1-AAA), 25(1-B)(a), 26(2), 35 and 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the bag of this petitioner altogether 98 live cartridges were recovered.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He has further submitted that actually the recovery was made from a boat and the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31650 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026 2/2 was not on boat. It has further been submitted that the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and police have not complied Section 105 of the BNSS while making seizure. Learned counsel for the petitioner has lastly submitted that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 25.08.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned A.C.J.M.-II, Danapur in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No.672 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T