Ramkrit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30543 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2025 Thana- KHIRHAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ramkrit Yadav S/O Vindeshwer Yadav @ Bindeshwar Yadav R/O VillageBairwa, P.O- Saharghat, P.S- Madhawapur, Distt.- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jagjit Roshan, Advocate Mr. Anjani Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-05-2025 Heard Mr. Jagjit Roshan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Pushpa Sinha, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Khirhar P.S. Case No. 19 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20, 22 of the NDPS Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of the petitioner, 5 kg of ganja was recovered from the dicky of bike.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Counsel also submits that the bike does not belong to the petitioner. It has also been submitted that from perusal of the seizure list, it will transpire that the recovery has been made from the dicky of the bike which does not belong to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30543 of 2025(2) dt.20-05-2025 2/2 petitioner. Counsel further submits that the contraband recovered has not even been tested with a Narcotic Test Kit. The informant has assumed that the contraband is ganja weighing 5 kg, which is more than a small quantity but less than a commercial quantity. Counsel submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Counsel further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.03.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal & Sessions Jugde-cum- Special Judge, NDPS, Madhubani in connection with Khirhar P.S. Case No. 19 of 2025/ G.R. No. 21 of 2025 (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T