Sanjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5130 of 2016 ====================================================== Sanjeet Kumar Son of Late Ram Bilash Prasad resident of Chotaki Cherki, P.O. Cherki, P.S. Sherghati, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Principal Secretary, Department of Co - Operative, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Registrar, Co - Operative Societies, Bihar, Patna 4.

The Joint Registrar, Co - Operative Societies, Magadh Division, Gaya 5.

The District Co - Operative officer, Gaya 6.

The Assistant Registrar, Co - Operative Societies, Sherghati, Gaya 7.

The Block Co - Operative Officer, Sherghati, Gaya 8.

Mahesh Prasad Son of name not known to the Petitioner, Joint Registrar, Co - Operative Societies, Magadh Division, Gaya 9.

Devendra Yadav 10.

Birendra Kumar Both sons of Sri Talkeshwar Yadav resident of Chotaki Cherki, P.O. Cherki, P.S. Sherghati, District - Gaya 11.

Sudarshan Rajak Son of Jatan Rajak 12.

Samim Sah Son of Late Bakridan Sah 13.

Binay Kumar Son of Late Kedar Singh 14.

Binay Kumar Singh Son of Sri Ram Charitra Singh 15.

Shiv Nandan Yadav Son of Sri Mahabir Yadav 16.

Soni Devi Wife of Aditya Das 17.

Renu Devi Wife of Ram Bilash Das 18.

Anita Devi Wife of Arbind Thakur 19.

Rajanti Devi Wife of Hardayal Yadav 20.

Sunita Devi Wife of Devnandan Prajapat 21.

Ujjawal Kumar Singh Son of Suresh Prasad Singh All Members of the Managing Committee of Cherki PACS, village + P.O. Cherki, P.S. Sherghati, District - Gaya ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Amar Nath Deo- SC26 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Patna High Court CWJC No.5130 of 2016(5) dt.13-02-2023 2/2 counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ application.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U