← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6548/2015disposed

Most. Shabrun Nesha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-07-08Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6548 of 2015 ====================================================== Most. Shabrun Nesha wife of Late Nek Mohammad, resident of village- Sirsa Khap, P.S. Muffassil, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The District Collector, East Champaran 3.

The Addl. Collector, East Champaran 4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar Motihari 5.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Sadar Motihari 6.

The Circle Officer, Motihari 7.

Mustapha Mian, Son of Late Akabar Mian, resident of village- Sirsa Khap, P.S. Muffassil, District- East Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Choudhary For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, AC to G.A.-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 08-07-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for setting aside the order as contained in Memo No.1440 dated 1-9-2014 issued under signature of Circle Officer, Motihari by which whereby and whereunder the Jamabandi no.777 in name of the petitioner per area of 14 decimal of the land has been cancelled is directed the following facts and

Patna High Court CWJC No.6548 of 2015(3) dt.08-07-2025 2/2 circumstances of the case.

(ii) to pass other order/orders as your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the light of the facts of the case.

3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner being the lady be granted liberty to approach the appropriate authority for the redressal of her grievance.

4. Granting said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of with further observation, if such petition is preferred in four weeks from today, the same be taken up, considered and notice be served to the parties so that the matter is taken to its logical at an earliest.

5. It is made clear that this Court has not commented on the merit of the case.

6. Pending Interlocutory Application(s), if any also stand(s) disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U