Niranjan Kumar Bind @ Niranzan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32441 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-157 Year-2021 Thana- MASAUDHI District- Patna ====================================================== NIRANJAN KUMAR BIND @ NIRANZAN KUMAR SON OF RAMA BIND Resident of Village- Kharat, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Asha Devi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 12-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is an accused in connection with Masaurhi P.S. Case No. 157 of 2021 registered for the offences under sections 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code lodged on 21.03.2021 by the informant, Dinesh Bind.

The prosecution story, in brief, a case has been lodged on the basis of a written application of one Dinesh Bind on 21.03.2021 alleging therein interalia that he had married his daughter, Runti Devi with the this petitioner, in accordance with hindu rituals. It has been further alleged that the in laws of his daughter used to demand a motorcycle and chain in dowry and for that they tortured her. It has been further alleged that on 20.03.2021, the deceased Runti Devi informed the informant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32441 of 2023(2) dt.12-07-2023 2/2 about assault being made to her and thereafter next day, he came to know that husband Niranjan Bind, father in law Rama Bind, and his wife as well as brother in law Prince Kumar, committed her murder by strangulation. Accordingly, the FIR. Considering the kind of allegation that has come as also the fact that he is husband and cannot exonerate himself for having failed to do the duties that was required with him, this Court is not inclined to extend him privilege of bail, which is accordingly rejected.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Neha/KiranU T