Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24642/2016dismiss for nonprosecution

Imtiyaz Jhankar v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Vigilance Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2025-07-22Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24642 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2014 Thana- C.B.I CASE District- Patna ====================================================== Imtiyaz Jhankar, Son of Md. Safiur Rahman, Permanent resident of VillageHusainabad, P.S. Moro Basuara, District Darbhanga. The then Police SubInspector, Aloli Police Station, District- Khagaria. At present resident of at Sector-9, Street -2, Quarter No-22, P.S. Harla Thana, Sector-9, DistrictBokaro Jharkhand. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Vigilance Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

None For the Vigilance :

Mr. Anil Singh, O,I/C Vigi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-07-2025 Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner despite cautioning by the order dated 21.03.2025. Even on the last date, the matter was unattended by the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the vigilance department submits that there is no merit in the case and the petitioner has filed the present petition only with intent to cause delay in disposal of criminal proceeding pending before learned Trial Court, and hence, he is not attending the matter.

3. I find that the present case is still at the stage of admission and it is old case running from 2016 for quashing the cognizance order.

4. Learned counsel for the vigilance department

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24642 of 2016(21) dt.22-07-2025 2/2 further submits that even discharge application of the petitioner has been dismissed by learned Trial Court vide order dated 02.06.2018.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts, I find that the petitioner is not serious about prosecuting the matter, and hence, he is not attending the case. It appears that the present petition has been filed with intent to delay the criminal trial.

6. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for default.

7. Learned Trial Court is directed to proceed with the trial without any delay.

8. Let a copy of this order be sent to learned Trial Court forthwith for information and needful.

(Jitendra Kumar, J) ramesh/- U