Abinash Kumar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.29 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4797 of 1995 ====================================================== 1.

Abinash Kumar Singh 2.

Ranjan Kumar Singh, 3.

Ashok Kumar Singh, All sons of Late Jay Shankar Singh, Resident of village - Mijhan, Police Station Jagdishpur, District - Bhojpur, At Present, residing at Village - Barnaon, Police Station Ayar Jagdishpur , District - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal, Consolidation Training Institute, Patna empowered under Section 35 of the Consolida 3.

The Director, Consolidation, Bhojpur at Ara 4.

The Consolidation officer, Jagdishpur, District Bhojpur 5.

Jawahar Singh, 6.

Heera Lal Singh, Both sons of Late Ganga Dayal Singh, 7.

Subhash Chandra Singh, 8.

Man Singh, both sons of Jawahar Singh, All respondent nos. 5 to 8 residing at village - Mithala, Police Station Jagdishpur, District - Bhojpur 9.

Anil Kumar Singh, 10.

Pramod Kumar Singh, Both son of Late Jay Shankar Singh, 11.

Baby, daughter of Late Jay Shankar Singh, All respondent nos. 9 to 11 resident of village - Mijhan, Police Station Jagdishpur, District - Bhojpur at Present residing at village - Barnaon, Police Station Ayar Jagdishpur , District - Bhojpur 12.

Most. Madhuri Devi, Wife of Late Hari Shankar Singh, 13.

Kanchan Kumari, daughter of Late Hari Shankar, Both resident of Barnaun, Police Station Jagdishpur, District - Bhojpur 14.

Hiramani Devi, daughter of Late Ganga Dayal Singh, Resident of village - Mithala, Police Station Jagdishpur, District - Bhojpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 14-12-2023 Despite repeated calls, nobody has

Patna High Court C. REV. No.29 of 2017(2) dt.14-12-2023 2/2 bothered to appear for the petitioners, hence, it appears that the petitioners have got no interest in prosecuting the present review petition, thus, this Court has no option but to dismiss the present review petition for want of prosecution.

2.

Accordingly, the present review petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U