← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7675/2023dismissed

M/S Koshi Traders v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-19The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7675 of 2023 ====================================================== M/s Koshi Traders through its proprietor Mohammad Ziaul Hoda, Sex- Male, Aged about 52 years, Son of Mohammad Nasim Uddin Hoda, ResidenceCum-Office Address Mohalla - Ward No. 15, N.H - 107, Ranihat, Post and Police Station - Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsha, Bihar - 852127. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Commissioner of State Taxes, Government of Bihar, Patna. New Secretariat, Baily Road, Patna - 800001. 2.

The Additional Commissioner (Appeals) State Taxes Division - Purnia, At, Post and Police Station - Purnia, District - Purnia. 3.

The Assistant Commissioner-Cum-Adjudicating Authority, State Taxes Circle - Saharsa At, Post and Police Station - Saharsa, District - Saharsa. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Radha Raman, Advocate Mr. Nawnit Kumar Tiwari, Advocate Mr. Sunil Kumar More, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vivek Prasad, GP-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 19-05-2023 The writ petition is filed against the appellate order dated 21.02.2023 (Annexure-5) which was rejected on the ground of delay. The appeal was filed against Annexure-3 order dated 19.03.2021.

2. The appellate order specifically noticed Section 107 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("BGST Act" hereafter) which permits an appeal to be filed

Patna High Court CWJC No.7675 of 2023 dt.19-05-2023 2/3 within three months and also apply for delay condonation with satisfactory reasons within a further period of one month. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No. 3 of 2020, In Re: Cognizance For Extension of Limitation. Therein, due to the pandemic situation limitation was saved between 15.03.2020 till 28.02.2022. It was also directed that an appeal could be filed within ninety days from 01.03.2022. Hence, an appeal could have been filed on or before 29.05.2022, which provision was not availed by the petitioner herein. The Hon'ble Supreme Court also declared that if a longer period than 90 days is provided in a Statute, then that longer period will apply.

In the BGST Act, u/s 107(4) there is a provision for condonation of delay, if the appeal is filed delayed, within one month of expiry of limitation. Even if that be deemed to be appealable then the appeal ought to have been filed by 28.06.2022. The appeal is filed only on 19.01.2023 after 205 days from the date on which even the limitation period as stipulated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, expired.

3. In the above circumstances, we find no reason to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226, especially since it is not a measure to be employed where there

Patna High Court CWJC No.7675 of 2023 dt.19-05-2023 3/3 are alternate remedies available and the assessee has not been diligent in availing such alternate remedies within the stipulated time.

4. The writ petition hence would stand dismissed (K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) ( Madhuresh Prasad, J) sujit/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 20.05.2023 Transmission Date