← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/20449/2013withdrawn

Johanand Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-08-27Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19625 of 2013 ====================================================== Ranjan Amit Kumar Singh and Ors ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondents ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20449 of 2013 ====================================================== Johanand Kumar and Anr ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State Of Bihar and Ors ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19625 of 2013) For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Prasad, AC to AAG-4 :

Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, Advocate For the BSSC :

Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Sr. Advocate :

Ms. Kanupriya, Advocate :

Mr. Abhishek Anand, Advocate (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20449 of 2013) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. V.M.K Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19625 of 2013 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners.

2. Learned Senior Counsel for the Bihar Staff Selection Commission and learned counsel for the RespondentState are present.

3. This is an old matter of the year 2013 and still the petitioners are not taking interest in pressing the writ

Patna High Court CWJC No.19625 of 2013(8) dt.27-08-2025 2/2 application. It is being adjourned by way of last chance and if on the next date also no one appears on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ application then the Court may consider dismissing it for non-prosecution.

4. Put up this case on 10.09.2025.

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20449 of 2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Senior counsel for the Bihar Staff Selection Commission and learned counsel for the Respondent-State.

2. After advancing some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawing the present writ application as the same has become infructuous.

3. As prayed for, this writ application is disposed of as having become infructuous.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Gaurav Sinha/- U