Anmol Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32864 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2023 Thana- JADIA District- Supaul ====================================================== Anmol Yadav S/o Late Laxmi Yadav R/o Village - Parsagardhi, Tola Fasiya Kothi, Ward No. 3, P.S - Jadiya, District - Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amar Nath Yadav, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jadiya P.S. Case No. 223 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the I.P.C.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and other co-accused persons formed an unlawful assembly, pursuant to which the petitioner is alleged to have ordered to kill, thereafter, the co-accused persons assaulted the informant's father with legs, slaps, fists and bricks in his stomach and chest, following which the informant's father was referred to a higher medical facility for treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the death of the father of the informant occurred after one month, pursuant to which Section 302 was added. It has been submitted that there is an allegation of being an order-giver

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32864 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026 2/2 against the petitioner and, as per the allegation itself, the petitioner did not take part in the assault. It has further been submitted that none of the accused persons were armed with lethal weapons, and an ornamental allegation has been levelled against the petitioner so as to falsely implicate him in the present case.

5. Learned A.P.P, for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, in connection with Jadiya P.S. Case No. 223 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharitya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.)

7. This application stands allowed.

(Praveen Kumar, J) niku/- U T