Patna High CourtCR. MISC./33863/2019dismissed

Md. Rakimuddin v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-24Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33863 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2018 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria ====================================================== MD. RAKIMUDDIN Son of Late Salimuddin Resident of Village-Ujani, P.S.- Naugachia, District-Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2019 Heard the parties.

Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court, vide order dated 20.9.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No.47572 of 2018 and the allegation against the petitioner is of recover of 10 semi-manufactured country-made pistols along with other articles.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is in custody for about one year and five months and there is no chance of conclusion of the trial in the near future. .

Heard learned A.P.P. and perused the report submitted by the learned trial court, from which it appears that in this case statement of the accused petitioner under Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. after closure of the evidence has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33863 of 2019(3) dt.24-07-2019 2/2 recorded but an application has been filed by the defence under Section 311 of the Cr.P.C. and against order passed, the defence has moved before the learned District and Sessions Judge in the revision , however, he has assured that as soon as the revision order will be passed, he will try to dispose of the application within a period of one month..

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial once the revision application is disposed of. With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T