← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8628/2022dismissed

Kumari Ranju Yadav, v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-13Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8628 of 2022 ====================================================== Kumari Ranju Yadav, Wife of Yogendra Yadav, Resident of Village-Semra Buzurg, Police Station-Nautan, District-Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, I.C.D.S., Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra. 4.

The Collector and District Magistrate, Siwan. 5.

The District Programme Officer, Siwan.

6.

The Child Development Project Officer, Nautan, District-Siwan. 7.

The Ward Member, Ward No. 06 Gram Panchayat Raj Khalwan, BlockNautan, District-Siwan. 8.

Minta Kumari Devi, Wife of Shri Mithilesh Yadav, resident of Village-Semra Buzurg, Police Station-Nautan, District-Siwan. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prasant Pratap ( Gp 2 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 13-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That, this is an application for issuance of appropriate writ(s) / direction(s) for quashing the order dated 07.01.2021 passed by the respondent no.4 in Anganbari Appeal Case No.83/2018-19 by which he has allowed the appeal filed by the respondent no.8 and set aside the order dated 27.06.2018 passed by the respondent no.5, by which the

Patna High Court CWJC No.8628 of 2022(2) dt.13-02-2024 2/2 respondent no.5 has cancelled the selection of the respondent no.8 from the post of Anganbari Sevika at newly created additional Anganbari Centre at ward no.06, Gram Panchayat Raj Khalwan, Block-Nautan, District-Siwan."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the learned civil court of competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U