Ravindra Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Deptt. Of Home Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 887 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Ravindra Prasad Singh, male, aged about 39 years, Son of Ram Padarth Singh, Resident of Village - Kauwa, P.S.- Halai, Distt - Samastipur. 2.

Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Pankaj Kumar, male, aged about 30 years, Son of Late Baidyanth Singh, Resident of Village - Sahpur Undi, P.S.- Patori, Distt - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga.

3.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Samastipur.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, G.P.-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR) 4.

03-07-2019 On call, a prayer is being made on behalf of petitioners to grant accommodation. This prayer was made in presence of Mr. Nadim Seraj, learned Govt. Pleader - 5. Yesterday also, when the case was called out, there was nonappearance on behalf of petitioners and today, the prayer for adjournment has been made.

Mr. Seraj, learned Govt. Pleader - 5 submits that virtually, the writ petition has become infructuous, since the

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.887 of 2019(4) dt.03-07-2019 2/2 petitioners were directed to report before a police station till 31st of May, 2019. Besides this, it has been argued that against the order impugned, there is already statutory provision. Be that as it may, considering the fact that the life of impugned order has already been lost, there is no reason to grant any accommodation.

The criminal writ petition stands dismissed as same has become infructuous.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) ( Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) anay U