Navdeep Chandra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7598 of 2016 ====================================================== Navdeep Chandra Prasad, son of Sri Fekan Rai, resident of village -Dighi Kala Pashchim, P.S. -Hazipur Sadar, District -Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar at Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Bihar Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar at Patna 3.

The Commissioner Excise, Bihar at Patna.

4.

The Collector, Vaishali at Hazipur (Bihar ) 5.

The Additional Collector ( Departmental Enquiry) , Viashali at Hazipur. 6.

The Superintendent Excise, Vaishali at Hazipur (Bihar). 7.

The Sub - Divisional Officer, Mahua, Vaishali. 8.

The S.D.P.O., Mahua, Vaishali.

9.

The Officer -in- Charge, Baligaon, Vaishali.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Sri N.K. Agrawal, Sr . Advocate Mr.Diwakar Upadhyaya For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Lalit Kishore- Paag ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR) 04-09-2019 After some argument, Shri N.K. Agrawal, learned senior counsel, assisted by Sri Diwakar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner in presence of Shri Vikash Kumar, learned Standing counsel No. 11 requests for disposal of the present writ petition so that petitioner may avail alternative remedy. However he submits that while disposing the writ

Patna High Court CWJC No.7598 of 2016(12) dt.04-09-2019 2/2 petition this court may grant some protection i.e. in respect of delay in availing remedy.

The court is of opinion that request made by Shri Agrawal, learned senior counsel is genuine. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to avail alternative remedy.

It goes without saying that if the petitioner approaches the authority concerned with the grievance, which has been raised in the present writ petition, the period consumed by the petitioner in pursuing the present writ petition shall be excluded while considering the limitation matter. (Rakesh Kumar, J) ( Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) praful/- U