Navin Kumar Sukla v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31952 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-333 Year-2021 Thana- MADHUBANI TOWN DistrictMadhubani ====================================================== 1.

NAVIN KUMAR SUKLA S/o Ram Chandra Sukla Resident of VillageDagar Bhithi, P.S.- Madhubani Town, District- Madhubani. 2.

Shivnath Sukla S/o Late Bindeshwar Sukla Resident of Village- Dagar Bhithi, P.S.- Madhubani Town, District- Madhubani. 3.

Kishore Kumar Sukla S/o Ram Chandra Sukla Resident of Village- Dagar Bhithi, P.S.- Madhubani Town, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 323, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have antecedent of two cases, petitioner no.3 is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he was intercepted by accused persons, petitioner no.3 assaulted by an iron rod causing injury on head, thereafter Shivnath assaulted by fist near eyes and snatched his gold chain and further the accused also assaulted his brother Sushil.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31952 of 2022(2) dt.22-11-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true, without admitting for the purpose of anticipatory bail, then the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature which amply demonstrates that the petitioners never had any intention of committing such serious occurrence.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 333 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T