Nilu Kiran Azad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.511 of 2017 In Letters Patent Appeal No.379 of 2011 ====================================================== Nilu Kiran Azad W/o Late Shyam Kumar Singh resident of Village - Shahjahanpur Bhagwanpur Rati, P.O. - Balukaram, P.S. - Vaishali, Distt. - Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Mr. R.K.Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Human Resource Development/Deptt. of Education,

3. Mr. Ram Chandra Dudu, The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

4. Mr. Satya Narayan Prasad, The District Superintendent of Education / The District Education Officer

5. Mr. Aftab Alam, The Block Development Officer, Mahua, Distt. - Vaishali at Hazipur.

6. Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, The Block Education Officer, Mahua, Distt.- Vaishali at Hazipur.

7. Mr. Nav Nath Mishra, The Block Education Officer, Vaishali, District - Vaishali at Hazipur.

8. Mr. Udai Kumar, The Block Development Officer, Vaishali at Hazipur.

9. Ms. Shashi Priya Verma, The Block Development Officer, Goraul, Distt. - Vaishali at Hazipur.

10. Mr. Sushil Kumar, The Block Education Officer, Goraul, Distt. - Vaishali at Hazipur.

11. Mr. Sriniwas, The Block Development Officer, Lalganj, Distt. - Vaishali at Hazipur.

12. Mr. Vijay Kumar, The Block Education Officer, Lalganj, Distt. - Vaishali at Hazipur.

13. Mr. Anil Das, The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Pancahyat Raj - Laxmi Narayanpur, Block - Mahua, Distt.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR) 23-01-2019 Perused the show-cause filed on behalf of the Opposite Party No. 4. Pursuant to the direction of this Court

Patna High Court MJC No.511 of 2017(2) dt.23-01-2019 2/2 vide order dated 12.07.2011 passed in L.P.A. No. 379 of 2011, the concerned authority has already passed an order, though belatedly. Nonetheless, the explanation offered in the show-cause for such delayed compliance of the order is accepted by us.

Nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present contempt application.

The contempt application accordingly stands dismissed.

If the appellant / applicant so desires, she may challenge the order passed by the authority.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) ( Sanjay Priya, J) skm/- U