Raj Naerayan Mahto v. Bihar State Board Of Regligious Trust And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.54 of 2016 ====================================================== Raj Naerayan Mahto son of Yugeshwar Mahto, resident of Village- Sauriya, Police Station- Jalley, District- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Bihar State Board Of Regligious Trust 2.

The Circle Officer, Jalley, District- Darbhanga-cum Chairman, Shiv Mandir, Trust Committee, Village 3.3. Sumit Kumar Son of late Manoj Kumar Singh All are resident of MohallaAsha Bhawan, Ashok Nagar, 7-20,Opposite Haridwar Mandir, Ashok Nagar, District- Patna-20.

4.

Umesh Kumar Singh 5.

Akhilesh Kumar Singh 6.

Pramod Kumar Singh 7.

Ramesh Kumar Singh 8.

Ashok Kumar Singh All sons of Late Laldhari Singh @ Laldhari Mahto, resident of Village- Sauriya, Police Station- Jalley, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Board :

Mr. Ganpati Trivedi, Sr. Advocate For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. J.S. Arora, Sr. Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate Mr. G. Pratap, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 01-07-2024 On call, none appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsels for the respondents are present.

2. On 15.04.2024, the following order was passed:- "Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is unable to get the present and correct address of respondent nos. 3(ii) and 3((iii) and seeks further time of four weeks for

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.54 of 2016(12) dt.01-07-2024 2/2 filing requisites for issuance of notice upon respondent nos. 3(ii) and 3(iii).

2. Under the aforesaid circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps for issuance of notice upon respondent nos. 3(ii) and 3(iii) on their present and correct address within four weeks, failing which the petition will be dismissed.

3. List this matter on 28.06.2024."

3. Office has reported that requisites for issuance of notice upon respondent nos. 3(ii) and 3(iii) have not been filed.

4. Hence, for non-compliance of order dated 15.04.2024, the present petition stands dismissed. (Arun Kumar Jha, J) DKS/- U