← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10692/2015dismissed

Ram Dayal Sahu v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-08-21Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10692 of 2015 ====================================================== Ram Dayal Sahu Son of Late Juri Sahu, Resident of Village- Birpur Pindraun, Police Station- Lalmaniya, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Commissioner Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 3.

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Phulparas, District- Madhubani. 5.

The Circle Officer Circle-Khutauna, District- Madhubani. 6.

The Police Station Lalmaniya through O/C, District- Madhubani. 7.

Pawan Rai, Son of Chandradev Rai, Permanent Resident of Village- Tarhi, District- Saptari, Country- Nepal, Presently Resident of Village- Birpur Pindraun, Police Station- Lalmaniya, District- Madhuabni. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sarvesh Kr. Singh, AC to AAG-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 21-08-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1(i) For issuance of appropriate order, direction or writ in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the respondents to vacate the Government land/Public Road, situated at Mauza Birpur Pindraun, Khata No.8, Khesra No.1940/5719, old Area 014 Dhur, boundary North- Main Road, East- Gangai SouthNIZ (Petitioner), Parmeshwar Mandal, Police Sah, West- Station- Lalmaniya, District- Madhubani."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CWJC No.10692 of 2015(3) dt.21-08-2024 2/2 seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U