Dharamvir Prasad And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62523 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2016 Thana- THARTHARI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Ajay Prasad son of Sri Kailash Prasad, Resident of Village- Tribhuwan Bigha, P.S.- Tharthari, District- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 57412 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2016 Thana- THARTHARI District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.
Dharamvir Prasad S/o Late Hari Narayan Prasad, 2.
Bhushan Prasad S/o Sri Nasib Prasad, 3.
Pramod Kumar S/o Naresh Prasad, All residents of Vill.- Tribhuwan Bigha, P.S.- Tharthari, District- Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 62523 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sidhendra Narayan Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Anil Kumar, A.P.P.
For the O.P. No.2 :
Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Advocate Mr. Krishna Kumar Yadav, Advocate (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 57412 of 2018) For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sidhendra Narayan Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Anil Kumar, A.P.P.
For the O.P. No.2 :
Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Advocate Mr. Krishna Kumar Yadav, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62523 of 2018(4) dt.07-07-2026 2/2
2. The present Cr. Misc. Applications have been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 18.05.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd, Hilsa (Nalanda) in connection with S. Tr. No.453 of 2017 arising out of Tharthari P.S. Case No.81 of 2016.
3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this case may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to take all the points as raised in the petition, before the learned Trial Court at appropriate stage in accordance with law.
4. Learned APP for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners.
5. In view of the above, the present Cr. Misc. Applications are disposed of with the liberty to the petitioners, as prayed for.
6. The learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the disposal of the trial.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Utkarsh.k/- U T