Lalita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42053 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-291 Year-2019 Thana- CHHATAPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== LALITA DEVI Wife of Bhushan Das Resident of Village- Chakla, P.S.- Chhatapur, District- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-08-2021 Heard Mr. Pramod Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing. Petitioner renews her prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with Chhtapur PS Case No. 291/2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/201/120(B)/34 of the IPC inasmuch as earlier anticipatory bail application of the petitioner was permitted to be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file regular bail application vide order dated 08.02.2021 passed in Cr. Misc No. 28867/2020 (Annexure-1). It appears that petitioner has filed second anticipatory bail application instead of filing regular bail applicagtion as per previous order. When this Court was not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42053 of 2021(2) dt.25-08-2021 2/2 petitioner had sought to withdraw the application. Accordingly, the earlier anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a lady and has falsely been implicated in this case due to old enmity.

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the material on record and the fact that anticipatory bail application of the petitioner was rejected earlier by this Court, accordingly, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on the basis of anticipatory bail application filed for the second time. The same is, hereby, rejected. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) perwez U T